DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRADITIONAL LASIK AND CUSTOM LASIK
The LASIK procedure has positively impacted millions of people around the world, freeing many from the need for corrective lenses. Before recent technological developments, most people were either limited to glasses or contacts and vision correction surgery was risky at best. However, now that LASIK has been around for several years with an excellent track record, it’s commonly accepted as a very reliable procedure.
If you’re interested in benefitting from LASIK yourself, you may compare traditional LASIK vs custom LASIK. Custom LASIK is closely associated with the Wavefront guidance system, which takes three-dimensional measurements of how your eye processes images. The wavefront analysis offers the potential for an extremely precise procedure and it guides the laser while it reshapes your corneal tissue.
The breakthrough with custom LASIK is that the wavefront analysis diagnoses both LOAs (lower order aberrations) and HOAs (higher order aberrations). LOAs include the regular sources of visual blur that eyeglasses and contact lenses treat, including farsightedness, nearsightedness, and astigmatism, while HOAs include night glare, starbursts, halos around lights, double vision, decreased contrast, and more.
TheThe end result is that HOAs occur less often after custom LASIK when compared to traditional LASIK. In fact, Wavefront technology measurements are 25 times more precise than traditional LASIK. That means that you have an even better chance of achieving 20/20 vision and avoiding contrast sensitivity loss. It also increases your chances of avoiding HOA problems like haloes or glare while maximizing your corrected vision results.
Main Differences Between Traditional LASIK and Custom LASIK
The main differences between traditional LASIK and custom LASIK are quite clear: Wavefront technology has greatly increased precision levels and decreased the issues related to traditional LASIK procedures, and while it may cost more, most patients consider custom LASIK to be worth the incremental cost.